Integrations & Automation
Systems that talk to each other so people stop copying data between them.
Connect your CRM and ERP so sales and the back office work from the same customer and order records, instead of two versions of each.
CRM and ERP integration connects your sales system (leads, deals, customers) with your back-office system (orders, stock, invoices, finance), so both stay in step. Each field is linked to the system that owns it, and records move through the APIs and connectors each platform offers.
A good fit for
We list your systems, their records, plans and permissions, and what each API really allows.
Each shared field gets an owning system, with sync direction, timing and conflict rules agreed with your team.
We find duplicates and match records on stable keys before the first sync.
We build in test environments where platforms offer them, using realistic records with awkward cases.
Existing records load in a controlled, checked run. Only then does ongoing sync switch on.
Failures alert a named person, a scheduled check reports differences, and recovery steps are documented.
Problem
What we do
A won deal creates the customer and sales order in the ERP, with products and prices matched.
Problem
What we do
Failed syncs are logged, retried where safe, and raised to a named person.
Problem
What we do
Order, invoice and payment status flow back to the CRM, so sales can answer customers.
| Pattern | When it fits | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| One-way sync | One system owns the records; the other only reads them. | Edits in the receiving system are overwritten next sync. |
| Two-way sync | Both systems really edit the same records, like contact details. | A rule per field decides which conflicting change wins. |
| Scheduled sync | Hours-old records are fine, or the platform sends no events. | Changes wait for each run; large runs can hit limits. |
| Event-driven sync | Changes should reach the other system soon after they happen. | Missed or repeated events, so a scheduled check still runs. |
The ones you use, where your plan offers a documented API, webhooks or a supported connector. We do not publish a list of supported platforms or claim partnerships with vendors. Access is checked against the plan you hold before the work is scoped, and if a platform makes a reliable integration impractical, we say so.
Yes. The website validates and stores each submission first, then its server sends the lead to the CRM with the page and campaign it came from. The CRM credentials stay on the server, never in the page, and a submission that fails to reach the CRM is retried and flagged rather than lost.
They are cleaned and matched before the first sync, then loaded in a controlled run that is checked before ongoing sync starts. Duplicates are merged or held for review, historical records keep their original dates, and nothing in a source system is deleted as part of connecting it.
A dedicated integration user in each system with only the permissions the integration needs, in accounts your business owns, plus a sandbox or test environment where the platform offers one. Our project access is removed when the work ends, unless you choose to have us operate the integration for you afterwards.
It depends on how many records and fields are shared, how clean the existing data is, what each API allows and how many exceptions the business process has. Cleaning and matching existing data often takes longer than building the connection, so a timeline is given after the inventory, once those factors are known.
Short answers are above. Open a panel below for the specifics: how we decide, what is included and the deeper questions.
Sales and the back office each keep the system that suits them, and the work is making the records they share consistent.
When data already moves and the delay is approvals, reminders or assignments, the rules around the data are what need automating.
When the process needs records and screens that neither the CRM nor the ERP can hold, a custom application is the honest answer.
The system where a field is created and maintained in the normal course of work should own it: the CRM for contact details and sales stages, the ERP for billing terms, invoices and stock. The other system receives that field and does not edit it, which is what stops the two overwriting each other.
Ownership is decided field by field, not system by system. A customer can have contact details owned by the CRM and a credit limit owned by the ERP, and the integration moves each field in one direction. Where both systems genuinely edit a field, a written rule decides which change wins.
A typical split looks like the list below, and it differs between businesses.
Duplicates are prevented by matching each incoming record against existing ones on a stable key, such as an email address, a company domain or an external ID stored in both systems, before creating anything. When no confident match exists, the record is held for review instead of being created as a new customer.
Platform rules are not enough on their own. A CRM may deduplicate new contacts by email address and new companies by company domain name, yet not deduplicate companies created through its API by domain, so an integration that writes companies has to do its own matching first.
Existing duplicates are cleaned before the first sync, because an integration copies whatever it finds. After launch, the integration stores the ID from the other system on each record, so later updates find the right record without matching again.
They are held in a review queue with the reason, rather than created or discarded. A person decides whether the record is new or belongs to an existing customer, and the decision is stored so the same record does not stop the sync again.
CRM and ERP platforms limit how their APIs can be used: some include API access only on certain plans, many cap the requests an integration can make in a period, and requests beyond that cap are refused until a wait has passed. These limits are confirmed for the plan the business holds before an integration is designed.
The limits are set by each vendor, and they change. An ERP may, for example, make data access through its external API available only on certain pricing plans. A platform may also answer requests beyond its service protection limits with a 429 Too Many Requests error and a Retry-After header giving the number of seconds to wait.
An integration designed for those limits batches records, spreads large loads over time, waits as instructed when a limit is reached and resumes where it stopped. Volumes are estimated from real data before launch, so a limit is met in testing rather than on the first busy day.
Sometimes, through a supported export, a file transfer or a connector the vendor provides, but these routes are usually slower and less complete than an API. When the only reliable route is a higher plan, that cost is stated before the work is quoted, alongside any alternative.
Customer data is protected by moving only the fields the other system needs, over encrypted connections, through an integration user that holds the minimum permissions required, with credentials kept on the server and personal data kept out of logs. Which personal data may move at all is a legal question the business answers with its adviser.
Access token privileges should be restricted to the minimum required for the use case, and secrets should be rotated regularly so a stolen credential only works for a short time. Both apply to each system in the chain, not only the most sensitive one.
Moving personal data between systems can raise legal questions about purpose, retention and where data is stored. Those are decided by the business with its legal adviser; the integration implements the decisions, and no compliance outcome is promised.
An example of how one customer record moves through a CRM and an ERP, from the first inquiry to a paid invoice, with the system that owns each step named.
A form submission reaches the website, which validates and stores it first.
The CRM creates a lead or matches an existing contact.
Sales work the opportunity in the CRM, which owns its stage.
A won deal creates or updates the customer record in the ERP.
The ERP raises the order against that customer and its stock.
The ERP or accounting system issues the invoice.
The payment provider or bank confirms payment, and the invoice is marked paid.
Order and payment status are copied back so the CRM shows them.
Because every shared field has an owner, a change made in the right system reaches the others instead of being overwritten.
A won deal creates the customer and the order in the ERP, so the order starts from what sales agreed.
Order, invoice and payment status flow back to the CRM, so account managers can answer customers without asking finance.
Failed records and reconciliation differences reach a person on the day they happen, rather than at month end.
Form submissions stored by the website create or update CRM contacts with their source, instead of arriving as emails someone has to copy.
Closing a deal in the CRM creates the customer and the sales order in the ERP, with products and prices matched.
Invoices raised and payments recorded in the ERP update the account in the CRM, so renewals and collections start from current information.
Tell us what you need and when you need it. We reply with a clear scope and the next steps.