Branding & Creative Design
Identity, visual language and the assets that carry them everywhere.
Your logo has to work on a pen, a shirt, a one-color carton, a browser tab and a building. We design and test each mark for those uses.
A logo design project delivers a mark and the system around it. That means the main lockup, variants for different spaces, one-color and reversed versions, minimum sizes and clear space. It also covers the uses that are not allowed, and source files in every format your printers, suppliers and developers ask for.
A good fit for
We learn what you do, who you sell to, and the smallest size and hardest background.
We develop distinct directions, so your review is a clear choice, not a matter of shades.
You choose one direction, and we record why, so later decisions follow the brief.
We draw the mark properly: proportion, weight, spacing, optical correction and any letterforms.
We produce the versions you need, each tested at the size it will really appear.
We write down clear space, minimum sizes, approved backgrounds and the list of banned changes.
You receive vector sources, exports and the usage sheet, organized so the current file is obvious.
Problem
What we do
We build horizontal, stacked, square and mark-only versions, plus one-color and reversed treatments.
Problem
What we do
We set a minimum size for each version, and draw a simpler small version where needed.
Problem
What we do
We write down clear space, minimum sizes, approved backgrounds and a list of banned changes.
| Form | What it is | Where it works best |
|---|---|---|
| Wordmark | The name, drawn as considered letterforms. | Names worth reading and remembering. |
| Monogram or lettermark | One or more initials treated as a mark. | Long names, app icons and profile images. |
| Symbol | An abstract or pictorial mark with no letters. | Brands able to teach a symbol, or crossing languages. |
| Combination mark | A symbol and the name locked together. | Most businesses, with or without room for a name. |
The number of directions presented and the number of review rounds are agreed in writing in the brief, because both change the cost and the timeline. We present a small number of considered, distinct directions rather than a large volume of variations, since a choice between arguments is a decision and a choice between forty thumbnails is a lottery.
Yes, and it is tested that way before approval rather than converted afterwards. A single-color version is required by stamps, embroidery, engraving and one-color print, and a reversed version is drawn for dark and photographic backgrounds rather than produced by inverting the colors, which rarely works.
Yes, and print is where most marks fail first. Print introduces constraints that screens do not have: single-color processes, ink spread on absorbent stock, small applications on labels and the color differences between screen and press. Packaging artwork itself is covered under packaging design, and the two are frequently scoped together.
It follows the number of directions, the review cycle and the size of the variant set rather than a fixed schedule. A single mark with a compact variant set is a short engagement. A mark that has to serve sub-brands, packaging and merchandise takes longer, because each of those adds real tests the mark has to pass before it is approved.
Ownership and rights are stated in the project agreement before work begins, so nobody is guessing later. Vector source files are handed over rather than retained, which is the practical half of ownership: a mark you cannot get the source artwork for is one you cannot take to another supplier.
Short answers are above. Open a panel below for the specifics: how we decide, what is included and the deeper questions.
A new business, a name change, or an existing logo that fails in one color, at small size or in print. The work is the mark and the system of versions around it.
If color, typography, imagery, layout and guidelines are also undecided, the mark is one deliverable inside a larger piece of work and is cheaper to commission that way than twice.
Where customers already know the mark, redrawing it properly — correcting proportion, weight, spacing and the missing variants — keeps the equity you hold and fixes the execution that is costing you.
Because the spaces it has to fit are shaped differently and the processes that reproduce it have different limits. A wide lockup cannot fill a square application icon, a full-color mark cannot be embroidered in one thread, and detail that reads at poster size disappears at favicon size. One file cannot do all of it.
The versions are not decoration. Each one exists because a real application demands it, and the set is decided from where the business will actually put the mark rather than from a standard list. A company that will never print a carton does not need a carton version, and a company going to retail needs it before the first order.
Refresh when customers recognize the mark and the problem is execution: weak proportions, a color that fails on screen, no usable variants. Redesign when the mark actively misdescribes the business — wrong market, wrong offer, wrong name — because recognition of the wrong thing is not an asset worth protecting.
Recognition you already hold is real value and discarding it has a cost that rarely appears in the quote. That is why the question is asked in that order: what does the current mark earn you, and what is it costing you? Where the answer is that it earns recognition and costs you flexibility, the honest recommendation is a refresh, and it is usually the cheaper job as well.
A redesign carries downstream work that a refresh does not: signage, stationery, packaging artwork, merchandise, application icons, profiles and every document template. Scoping the change means scoping that list, not just the mark.
Yes. A raster file is redrawn as vector artwork, which is also the moment to correct the proportions, spacing and weight that were approximate in the original. The redrawn version is visually the same mark and is finally usable at any size.
It is inventoried before the change so the cost is visible: signage, print stock, packaging artwork, templates, profiles, application icons and any physical product in circulation. Some of it is replaced immediately and some as it runs out, and that is a decision made with the list in front of you.
Vector source artwork, plus raster exports for screen use and a favicon set. Vector artwork stores the mark as shapes rather than pixels, so it scales from a browser tab to a building with no loss of edge quality, and it is the only form a printer or a manufacturer can work from at production quality.
Raster images have a fixed number of pixels, so enlarging one enlarges the pixels. Vector artwork stores curves and coordinates, which is why the same file can be a favicon and a vehicle wrap. It is also the form that converts cleanly into the single-color and cut-path versions that embroidery, engraving, screen printing and die-cutting need.
For the web, SVG is a vector format the browser renders directly, which is why a logo delivered only as a raster image is both larger to download and worse to look at.
No. Designing a mark and registering a trademark are different acts. Registration is a legal process handled through a national or regional intellectual property office, usually with a trademark attorney, and ASquared Creatives does not provide legal services, conduct clearance searches, or file applications.
What design work does provide is the artwork and the specification a filing needs, in the formats an office will accept, which we hand over on request. What it cannot provide is an assurance that a mark is available, because availability is a legal question about existing registrations and prior use in specific classes and territories.
The practical sequence most businesses follow is to have a professional clearance search done before committing to a mark publicly, and to file in the territories and classes where the business actually trades. Both steps are legal work, and a trademark attorney can advise on them for the specific mark.
The visible part of logo design is the exploration. The part that decides whether the mark survives is everything after it, which is why a logo bought as a single image tends to need redrawing as soon as it has to work small or in one color.
What the business is, who it addresses, and the practical constraints the mark must survive.
Distinct directions developed far enough to be judged as arguments rather than as sketches.
One route chosen, with the reasoning recorded so later decisions can be checked against it.
Proportion, weight, spacing and optical correction. The stage where a shape becomes a mark.
Horizontal, stacked, square, mark-only, single-color and reversed versions, each tested at real size.
Clear space, minimum sizes, approved backgrounds and the list of alterations that are not permitted.
Vector sources, screen exports, a favicon set and a usage sheet, organized so the current file is obvious.
Because it was tested in one color, reversed, small and on dark before it was approved — rather than being discovered to fail when the first shirt order arrives.
Clear space, minimum size and a misuse list are what stop a logo being slowly redrawn by well-meaning people under deadline pressure.
Printers, manufacturers, merchandise suppliers and developers each need a different file. Handing over the right set removes a recurring round of emails and a recurring risk of somebody guessing.
Vector artwork and a variant system mean the next application — a vehicle, an application icon, a carton, a trade stand — is covered by work already done.
The mark comes first because everything else references it, and the rest of the identity system is usually the immediate next decision.
The original was made quickly, cheaply or by a founder. It has recognition attached to it now, so the question is how much to keep — which is a redesign question rather than a blank page.
A mark that lived on a website now has to work on packaging, labels and a shelf, in whatever printing process the converter uses. That is a different set of tests.
Tell us what you need and when you need it. We reply with a clear scope and the next steps.